Correspondence

Updated on 7th June 2025.

Email sent on 31st May 2025 to the Royal Astronomical Society’s Executive Director.

Dear Professor Russell,

I am writing to you urgently regarding an important matter that demands your immediate attention. Back in early 2011, reports were sent to Profs Ludden, Executive Director of the British Geological Survey, and McKenzie at Cambridge University, explaining why and how certain phenomena, clearly visible on Google Earth, came to be. These reports highlighted that Earth had suffered mantle-penetrating impacts and their inevitable consequences far more recently than has long been thought. This observation could not be negated by any non-assumptive (objective) argument or any reproducible experiment.

However, despite the significance of these findings, several leading academic geophysicists and geochemists, including both the above professors, repeatedly rejected the reports without substantiation or did not respond at all. Prof McKenzie did however suggest that I write to the Royal Astronomical Society.

Given the gravity of this issue, your earliest answer to the following question is essential, with full reasoning, please: Is the probability of mantle-penetrating impacts having struck Earth since about a billion years ago, plus enough time for the makings of water to start to reach the surface, definitely zero?

I would like to inform you that a comprehensive argument proving the accuracy of the 2011 report has been published on a dedicated website. You can access it via the following permalink: https://plate-tectonic-mechanism-refutation-replacement.co.uk. You are urged to visit and thoroughly read the entire website. It is crucial that your answer to the above question is complete, adhering to the uncompromising demands of the scientific method and charter commitments.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. I look forward to your detailed and reasoned response.

Sincerely,

Christopher Eaton (Supervisor of the Implementation of a Geological and Mining Engineering Agreement over Subsidiary Cement and Aggregate Manufacturing Companies in about a third of the world), P Dover (Overall Technical Director of the Parent Company), I G Ward (Parent Company Executive), J D R Eaton (Chemical Engineer), M Robinson (Principal Geologist in the Australian Subsidiary, and Entrepreneur), H R Thorp (Informed Teacher), P M R Stewart (Informed Member of the Public).

As of 4th June 2025 no response was received.

ESSENCE OF AN EMAIL AND LETTER TO BE SENT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE TO THE GUARDIAN’S EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

It has been written that the Guardian is fearless in exposing abuses of power, so please forgive me if I get right down to the purpose of this email. It is to say

that it is morally imperative for The Guardian to play a vital role in exposing that part of what students are paying for is fundamentally wrong, that unaccountable scientific authorities are deciding which research projects taxpayers must pay for, and which environmental policies restrict everybody’s freedom. It is due to all leading academic geophysicists and geochemists ignoring rules of the scientific method and the charter commitment to engage in dialogue with the public – and
that this will guarantee the global public’s sincere thanks for the Guardian providing an extremely valuable service for the whole world. It is not an academic matter but one of life and death.

Because, to explain our case fully, a lengthy discussion would be needed, we are instead asking you to appoint someone you trust to witness what will happen when we ask those listed below the first three of many more challenging questions that will prove conclusively that all the acknowledged experts have long been inexcusably on the wrong road to the Truth – a fact most likely to continue indefinitely to threaten lives and livelihoods.

Evasion in one form or another will be most likely, signifying the experts’ inability to answer the questions in support of what have long been wrong global beliefs in academic Earth Science. To get at the Truth several exchanges could well be needed, but because of the Guardian’s high standing and influence in society, not anywhere near as many as in our twelve years of being repeatedly rebuffed.

Would you each please show precisely how you carried out the obligatory tests to ascertain that a dynamic mechanism was definitely required inside the Earth different from the one observed ubiquitously at the surface?
How could Earth’s tectonics be prompted and then driven other than by the mantle penetrating impacts for which you were sent a wealth of factual evidence?
So, why did you all reject or ignore all this evidence with no scientific substantiation?

Rather than delve into all the relevant scientific detail, we urge you to visit and read all the website accessed by googling ‘Earth’s History is Fundamentally Misunderstood’ and with the Home Page titled with the same words and obviously meaning with respect to mantle penetrating impacts and their inevitable consequences.

The list of experts: Dr C Summerhayes, (Author and ex-Director of the Scientific Committee for Antarctic Research) Prof J Ludden (ex-Executive Director of the British Geological Survey), Prof D McKenzie (Cambridge University), Prof J Jackson (Cambridge University), The President of the Geological Society of London, Prof E Kissling (ETH Zurich), Prof D Mueller (Sydney University).

Letter signed by Christopher Eaton (Supervisor of the Implementation of a Geological and Mining Engineering Agreement over Subsidiary Cement and Aggregate Manufacturing Companies in about a third of the world), P Dover (Overall Technical Director of the Parent Company), I G Ward (Parent Company Executive), J D R Eaton (Chemical Engineer), M Robinson (Principal Geologist in the Australian Subsidiary, and Entrepreneur), H R Thorp (Informed Teacher), P M R Stewart (Informed Member of the Public).

PROMPTER TO THE EDITOR OF SPRINGER NATURE

This (soon to be published) prompter credited Springer Nature with identifying a fact despite it being unable to go further and describe the mechanism actually driving plate tectonics.

A while ago you promised to reply to an email concerning a fact that the prevailing postulated mechanism driving plate tectonics could not explain everything in the Pacific Ocean that it should to be part of a solution to the long-term enigma of what the mechanism is.

Please be informed that the solution was found several years ago by applying methods used in manufacturing industry.

You are urged to visit and read all the website titled ‘Earth’s History is Fundamentally Misunderstood’ where this prompter and all essential details of the solution have been sent by email and published.

Mr C H Eaton (website owner).

The following were received recently, 1 on this website’s return form, and 2 by email.

1. I can say that I have been convinced over an extended period by Chris Eaton’s explanations of earth’s working mechanisms.

I can also say that I have first hand experience of the refusal of recognised academia to enter into discussion of either Chris’s arguments or their own versions of the same arguments.

Their reliance on peer scrutiny to back up their arguments could be seen to be biased, especially when these peers have not been exposed to any conflicting versions of explanation.

2. I for one would wish (leading experts) to comply (with the rules of the scientific method, and with charter commitments) but refusal has been consistent for so many years.

Email sent on 7th June 2025 to Dr C Summerhayes, (Author and ex-Director of the Scientific Committee for Antarctic Research) Prof J Ludden (ex-Executive Director of the British Geological Survey) and Prof J Jackson (Cambridge University).

Subject: PLATE TECTONIC MECHANISM

You are urged to carefully read the website reached by googling ‘Earth’s History is Fundamentally Misunderstood’.

The unique solution to the above that has eluded leading experts for decades is given and discussed on the Page headed Corrected Assumptions.

Would you kindly admit that you have proved how costly it was not to comply with the rules of the scientific method, or with charter commitments?

Professor Jackson is addressed instead of Professor McKenzie (retired).

We look forward to early receipt of your completely honest replies.

Sincerely,

C H Eaton (retired Supervisor of the Implementation of a Geological and Mining Engineering Agreement over Subsidiary Cement and Aggregate Manufacturing Companies in about a third of the world), P Dover (retired Overall Technical Director of the Parent Company), I G Ward (retired Parent Company Executive), J D R Eaton (retired Chemical Engineer), M Robinson (retired Principal Geologist in the Australian Subsidiary, and Entrepreneur), H R Thorp (retired Informed Teacher), P M R Stewart (Informed Member of the Public).