Correspondence
OF PRIME IMPORTANCE
T0 Sir Duncan Wingham(NERC) and the BGS Director
Dear Sir/Madam,
FACTUAL PROOF OF THE PLATE TECTONIC MECHANISM
You are both first required to carefully read all the website reached by googling ‘Earth’s History is Fundamentally Misunderstood’.
The unique solution to the above subject of this correspondence that eluded all academics for decades is given and discussed on the Page headed Corrected Assumptions. It eluded them because they interpreted data using assumptions instead of facts.
Would you kindly admit that you have therefore proved how extremely costly it was not to comply with the rules of the scientific method, your charter commitments and key Laws of Physics and Nature? In short, you destroyed all trust in the peer review process and doomed your chance of ever proving the mechanism.
So, Sir Duncan, kindly retract your past implied charge that we are unable to solve problems. This is not to say that and you and all other academics were entirely wrong because you also often used facts. But please advise everyone to avoid assumption if at all possible.
Yours faithfully,
C H Eaton (retired Supervisor of the Implementation of a Geological and Mining Engineering Agreement over Subsidiary Cement and Aggregate Manufacturing Companies in about a third of the world), P Dover (retired Overall Technical Director of the Parent Company), I G Ward (retired Parent Company Executive), J D R Eaton (retired Chemical Engineer), M Robinson (retired Principal Geologist in the Australian Subsidiary, plus an entrepreneur), H R Thorp (retired Teacher), P M R Stewart (Member of the Public, and others who will be named as necessary.
————
It is inconceivable that anyone would positively want any scientist not to comply with the most basic rules of his/her profession (the demands of the scientific method, charter commitments and the laws of Physics and Nature). So it is also inconceivable that the recipients of this email will not publicly advise everyone else to avoid assumption if all possible.